Why does OptiStruct result differ greatly from those of ANSYS?
Answers
-
If the same FE mesh, same material and the same BC, you have to get 'the same' results.
So please check:
- Mesh
- MAT
- BC
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
If the same FE mesh, same material and the same BC, you have to get 'the same' results.
So please check:
- Mesh
- MAT
- BC
Agree..
Also, unit consistency, Did you scale the model by any chance?
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
Did you validate the result?
First, we need to investigate from which solver is the error is coming from.
WIth just results values, it is difficult to come to a conclusion.
The results of ANSYS are correct. I am solving same model with optistruct to get same results.
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
If the same FE mesh, same material and the same BC, you have to get 'the same' results.
So please check:
- Mesh
- MAT
- BC
Material and BC are all fine. Somewhat mesh is different. Because ANSYS meshes the model automatically whereas in hypermesh I did it manually. But I think it wont make such a big difference.
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
Agree..
Also, unit consistency, Did you scale the model by any chance?
Yes, I have cross verified the total mass of the model. Also checked units of Density, E and Poissons ratio. All are fine
0 -
That's IMPOSSIBLE !!!
I don't 'believe' to you until you show/share us two your models.
0 -
0
-
Altair Forum User said:
Sorry I cant share the result file as it is confidential. But i can share values of natural frequencies.
in Optistuct first natural frequency is 13.87 Hz
in ANSYS wb first natural frequency is 594 Hz
So can u plz tell me what are the possibilities of wrong input data??
The difference shown above is huge. Definitely modelling difference is expected in terms of fe steps. To conclude atleast share images of both cases showing constraint , system masses, frequency results etc.
0