I am trying to run a material non-linear analysis on my sample, but I keep getting *** ERROR # 4966 *** Minimum time increment reached, analysis aborted.
Hello! For context, I am making a simulation of a 3-D tensile sample. The sample is compromised of a PETG base with carbon fiber filaments implemented inside the base. I am trying to run a material non-linear analysis and I keep recieving *** ERROR # 4966 *** Minimum time increment reached, analysis aborted.
I have an idea that it might have to do with the auto contact setting I implemented or how the sets I created for the pulling load and boundary condition were made but I could be wrong. Please let me know if I need to clarify any information.
Attached is my hm file.
Best Answer
-
Hi
I did add a RBE2 to the left side holding the specimen and then added a rbe3 for loading on the right side!
Updated the BC and force set to just include 1 single node each
Model runs fine now.
/johan1
Answers
-
Hi
regarding the loads, is supposed to have FORCES on all nodes in you force set?A good start would be to apply displacement control on the "right side" instead of forces.
Regarding time step min you can control this with the nladapt card
$HMNAME LOADSTEPINPUT 3"nladapt"
NLADAPT 3DTMAX 0.1DTMIN 0.0001
Kind regards
/Johan1 -
Hi
I did add a RBE2 to the left side holding the specimen and then added a rbe3 for loading on the right side!
Updated the BC and force set to just include 1 single node each
Model runs fine now.
/johan1 -
Johan Dahlberg_20306 said:
Hi
I did add a RBE2 to the left side holding the specimen and then added a rbe3 for loading on the right side!
Updated the BC and force set to just include 1 single node each
Model runs fine now.
/johanHello!
Thank you so much! I'm very new to Hyperworks so I am trying my best to learn as much as I can. The reason why I wanted to make a set is because it was my understanding that doing so for a force for example would mean that the end would have a uniform pulling load. But it turns out I had a multiple amount of loads.
I've never had to use the rigid body command but looking into it, it just seems like a better way to run the simulation. I should have looked into this before.
Again, thank you for your help!
0