Negative pressure error. Supersonic wing simulation.

Rodrigo Martín
Rodrigo Martín Altair Community Member
edited February 2024 in Community Q&A

Hello. I am trying to model supersonic flow over a wing in Simlab, to later study aerodynamic heating and optimize the wing based on this.

I'll provide some background over the steps I took so far for the simulation.

Import wing tunnel geometry (solid cube with the wing removed)

Perform surface mesh, to later CFD mesh with boundary layer. 

Material: Ideal gas

Boundary conditions:

Inlet: 500 m/s (x) 20 m/s (z). 101325 Pa. 273 K.

Outlet: 101325 Pa

Symmetry

Slip for the wind tunnel walls

No slip for the wing wall.

Initial conditions; 

Eddy viscosity: 0.0001

Pressure: 101325 Pa

Temperature: 273 K

Velocity: 500 m/s (x) 20 m/s (z)

I attach the log file and the database file just in case it is of any help.

The simulation works fine for Mach 1.1, but as soon as I increase the inlet velocity to Mach 1.5, the solver crashes. In the log file, the error seems to come from a negative pressure arising. 

Is something wrong with my boundary/initial conditions? Maybe should I use far-field conditions instead of inlet/outlet? I have performed some attempts at it but seemed to get similar results, but I got to say I do not really understand that BC. 

Thanks beforehand. Any help is appreciated.

 

Answers

  • acupro
    acupro
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2024

    First - you'll need to use the mildly compressible or supersonic solver for this which from the Log file I see you're already doing - as in this tutorial:
    https://help.altair.com/hwcfdsolvers/acusolve/topics/tutorials/acu/acu_2400_intro_sl_r.htm

    That being said - external supersonic flows are not good applications for AcuSolve.  The target and tested applications for the compressible solvers are internal flows (compressors, turbos, etc) - not external.  Your experience may vary, since it is really beyond the scope of the solver.  You'll need very fine mesh - Y+ on the order of 1 with a growth rate around 1.1 to 1.2, fine resolution in the volume including the wake region, etc., and that particularly as shocks start to form.  Maybe smaller time increment, etc.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.