Best way to apply edge pressure in 2D plane strain? Referring to OS-V: 0085
Reference is made to OS-V: 0085 which uses nodal pressure to compute a pressure vessel (modelled as quarter segment).
I'm using different parameters to study a thick-walled cylinder. However, results show a kind of "hourglassing" effect with nodal pressure. It is not real hourglassing because it is only localised to the inner radius, elements are already fully integrated (second order) and the effect does not disappear with mesh refinement. See the figure below:
After checking the reference manual, it seems to be possible to try "PLOAD2" as alternative to radial nodal pressure. The figure below shows that PLOAD2 pressure applies to the element edges instead of the nodes:
But now I'm stuck, because these loads are not included in the analysis. Did I miss something? Could CQPSTN elements be incompatible? Or is there a better way to define edge pressure on a 2D model? See the model in attachment.
Best Answer
-
Wesley Peijnenburg said:
Thanks for the response!
PLOADE1 seems only available for LGDISP nonlinear, I cannot find it for the current static/linear model (see screenshot):
Is there an equivalent option for the linear/static case? I already tried PLOAD1; same result as PLOAD2 (no error, no deformation).
However PLOAD does at least give the below error message, maybe possible to solve?
*** See next message about line 143 from file: C:/temp/hw_session/b.fem
"PLOAD 1 1.0+7 10 11 0"
*** ERROR # 1000 *** in the input data:
Incorrect data in field # 6.My experience in Optistruct is limited, perhaps I missed an easy way to solve this?
look at the 2 attached models, for linear usage of PLOADE1 and PLOADSF
1
Altair EmployeeAnswers
-
I haven't tested but you probably need to use this one PLOADE1
0 -
Thanks for the response!
PLOADE1 seems only available for LGDISP nonlinear, I cannot find it for the current static/linear model (see screenshot):
Is there an equivalent option for the linear/static case? I already tried PLOAD1; same result as PLOAD2 (no error, no deformation).
However PLOAD does at least give the below error message, maybe possible to solve?
*** See next message about line 143 from file: C:/temp/hw_session/b.fem
"PLOAD 1 1.0+7 10 11 0"
*** ERROR # 1000 *** in the input data:
Incorrect data in field # 6.My experience in Optistruct is limited, perhaps I missed an easy way to solve this?
0 -
Wesley Peijnenburg said:
Thanks for the response!
PLOADE1 seems only available for LGDISP nonlinear, I cannot find it for the current static/linear model (see screenshot):
Is there an equivalent option for the linear/static case? I already tried PLOAD1; same result as PLOAD2 (no error, no deformation).
However PLOAD does at least give the below error message, maybe possible to solve?
*** See next message about line 143 from file: C:/temp/hw_session/b.fem
"PLOAD 1 1.0+7 10 11 0"
*** ERROR # 1000 *** in the input data:
Incorrect data in field # 6.My experience in Optistruct is limited, perhaps I missed an easy way to solve this?
look at the 2 attached models, for linear usage of PLOADE1 and PLOADSF
1 -
Adriano A. Koga_21884 said:
look at the 2 attached models, for linear usage of PLOADE1 and PLOADSF
The PLOADSF fem file example is exactly what I need... Hopefully my final question: how did you do it?
PLOADSF for a new pressure BC is not available as below screenshot shows:
However this was solved using the answer here:
https://community.altair.com/community?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=ea88ba531b0c8554507ca6442a4bcb95
PLOADSF can be accessed with the search option (Ctrl+f). So one obstacle is removed.
Now the documentation on PLOADSF mentions it can be defined using SURF or SET entry. It seems that you used a set? I tried following your footsteps with the set definition, but this is where I am now stuck.
This is the set in your model (which I want to reproduce), see dots on inner radius:
However when I try to reproduce (using model>contacts>surfaces) and select the edges I get something different, see blue cross marks:
Strangely, I see no difference in the context menu of both (except for ID and color).
What is causing this difference in set definition? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious and many thanks for your time and effort. Strongly appreciated!
0 -
Wesley Peijnenburg said:
The PLOADSF fem file example is exactly what I need... Hopefully my final question: how did you do it?
PLOADSF for a new pressure BC is not available as below screenshot shows:
However this was solved using the answer here:
https://community.altair.com/community?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=ea88ba531b0c8554507ca6442a4bcb95
PLOADSF can be accessed with the search option (Ctrl+f). So one obstacle is removed.
Now the documentation on PLOADSF mentions it can be defined using SURF or SET entry. It seems that you used a set? I tried following your footsteps with the set definition, but this is where I am now stuck.
This is the set in your model (which I want to reproduce), see dots on inner radius:
However when I try to reproduce (using model>contacts>surfaces) and select the edges I get something different, see blue cross marks:
Strangely, I see no difference in the context menu of both (except for ID and color).
What is causing this difference in set definition? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious and many thanks for your time and effort. Strongly appreciated!
I've create a set of type SURF (Ctrl+F >> SURF) and selected the 'edge'.
at least in 2022.2 it is working just fine.
0 -
Adriano A. Koga_21884 said:
I've create a set of type SURF (Ctrl+F >> SURF) and selected the 'edge'.
at least in 2022.2 it is working just fine.
The problem is now completely solved. Below screenshot shows the stress distribution is very uniform along the inner radius with PLOADSF:
Thanks again!
0