Coplanar Waveguide - How to set up ports?
Hello community,
I am currently working on a simulation involving a coplanar waveguide (CPW) in FEKO. The structure consists of a signal trace flanked by two ground planes. I’ve set up the geometry and boundary conditions, but I’m unsure if I’ve defined the ports correctly. There was an example online that I followed, but the fields don’t appear as I’d expect for a coplanar waveguide. Specifically, the electric field distribution doesn’t show the expected behavior for a quasi-TEM mode.
Here’s what I’ve done so far:
- Defined the CPW geometry with the correct signal and ground trace dimensions.
- Used an edge port to excite the signal trace relative to the ground planes.
- Specified the port width and height, but I’m not sure if they align correctly with the structure.
- Ran the simulation and visualized the near fields, which seem off compared to typical CPW field profiles.
My port is set up as following: A small rectangle extending back to the large ground plane connection (edge port).
This is the field line I get from this simulation:
I have attached my model for better analysis. My specific questions are:
- Is my port definition correct?
- Is there any other way I could use besides an edge port? (e.g. microstrip port)
- If the ports are defined correctly, why do the field lines look not as expected from a CPW?
- Off-topic: Is there any way to a have a finite thickness microstrip line? I would like to simulate the traces with a thickness of 35µm but would the edge port definition still work the same way for that? Or would I need a FEM simulation for that and then set up a FEM line port?
Thank you in advance!
Best regards
Fatih