nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Siemens Community Catalyst Program

The Siemens Community Catalyst program was co-created with our community to acknowledge technology leaders who consistently contribute to the Siemens Community. Nominations are accepted on a rolling basis.

Nominate Now

Multi Class Labels

PRIYAMOHAN

Hi, i am working with the data set of multi class labels can any one help me how to compare ROCs for such multi class labels ,even i couldn't find how to plot the results of multi class labels. I have used Binary2Multiclass learner and Polynomial by binomial classification but i am not getting the curve. I would feel better if you send the related operators with wiring. Thanks in advance...

Find more posts tagged with

AI Studio

Accepted answers

All comments

MariusHelf

Hi,

ROC curves can only visualize binary classification problems - what kind of output do you expect?

Best regards,
Marius

rahul_t

Hi Marius,
I am a newbie in Rapid Miner.
I am also facing same problem, when try to create a logistic model, here my label have more than 2 categories.
I know Logistic model is for modelling on Binomial Labels, But here I am asking that "How to Implement Multinomial Logistic Model in Rappid Miner"

Thanks in advance...

MariusHelf

Hi Rahul,

the Polynominal by Binominal Classification operator can help you.

Best regards,
Marius

rahul_t

Hi Marius,

Thanks for your suggestion, It worked.
Now I am trying to understand its output, I used "Naive Bayes" Classifier in it.
Well Thanks again for your Help.

With Regards
Rahul Trivedi

MariusHelf

Well, Naive Bayes supports multi-class labels out of the box

Actually Polynominal by Binominal Classification performs (by default) a one-vs.-all strategy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiclass_classification

Best regards,
Marius

IvanMarkus

]Hi,

I have similar problem: I have create a logistic model, my label have 3 categories.

I use Polynomial by Binomial Classification with subprocess Logistic Regression.

The problem is when I testing the model:

I use X-Validation. In the testing subprocess i use Apply Model > Performance and the console says that: Label and prediction must be of the same type but are polynominal and nominal, respectively.

I don't know how solve it.

MartinLiebig

Hi,

could you provide an example process?

Cheers,
Martin

IvanMarkus

Tree Process:

>Retrieve DB

>Set Role

>X-Validation

>>Training

>>>Polynomial by Binomial Classification

>>>>Logistic Regression

>>Testing

>>>Apply Model

>>>%Performance

Error: Label and prediction must be of the same type but are polynominal and nominal, respectively.

I think that I have to use some operator more before %Perfomance but I don't know which.

The outport lab in Apply Model is:

label Y(LABEL) polynominal =[A, B, C] = 0
DifX real =[-2.097 – 2.398] = 0
prediction prediction(Y(LABEL)) nominal ⊆[A, B, C] = 0
confidence_A confidence(A) real ⊆[0 – 1] = 0
confidence_B confidence(B) real ⊆[0 – 1] = 0
confidence_C confidence(C) real ⊆[0 – 1] = 0

I don't know how solve it.

MartinLiebig

hi,

would it be possible to copy the process' xml?

Cheers,
Martin

IvanMarkus

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<process version="5.3.015">
<context>
<input/>
<output/>
<macros/>
</context>
<operator activated="true" class="process" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" name="Root">
<description><p>This process loads numerical data from file and generates some attributes with the feature generation operator. The parameter list &quot;functions&quot; of the generation operator must be edited in order to define the functions which should be generated. </p><p>Try the following: <ul><li>Start the process. Use breakpoints to check the generation step. The parameter &quot;keep_all&quot; defines if all attributes should be used for the result example set or only the newly generated ones.</li><li>Edit the parameter list &quot;functions&quot; and add some other functions. Most of the known mathematical functions can be used.</li></ul></p></description>
<process expanded="true">
<operator activated="true" class="retrieve" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="60" name="Retrieve PR" width="90" x="45" y="30">
<parameter key="repository_entry" value="//P/PR"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="set_role" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="76" name="Set Role" width="90" x="246" y="30">
<parameter key="attribute_name" value="Y (LABEL)"/>
<parameter key="target_role" value="label"/>
<list key="set_additional_roles"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="x_validation" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="112" name="Validation" width="90" x="447" y="30">
<process expanded="true">
<operator activated="true" class="polynomial_by_binomial_classification" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="76" name="Polynominal by Binominal Classification" width="90" x="62" y="30">
<parameter key="parallelize_learning_process" value="true"/>
<process expanded="true">
<operator activated="true" class="logistic_regression" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="94" name="Logistic Regression" width="90" x="313" y="30"/>
<connect from_port="training set" to_op="Logistic Regression" to_port="training set"/>
<connect from_op="Logistic Regression" from_port="model" to_port="model"/>
<portSpacing port="source_training set" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_model" spacing="0"/>
</process>
</operator>
<connect from_port="training" to_op="Polynominal by Binominal Classification" to_port="training set"/>
<connect from_op="Polynominal by Binominal Classification" from_port="model" to_port="model"/>
<portSpacing port="source_training" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_model" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_through 1" spacing="0"/>
</process>
<process expanded="true">
<operator activated="true" class="apply_model" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="76" name="Apply Model" width="90" x="45" y="30">
<list key="application_parameters"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="performance" compatibility="5.3.015" expanded="true" height="76" name="Performance" width="90" x="179" y="30"/>
<connect from_port="model" to_op="Apply Model" to_port="model"/>
<connect from_port="test set" to_op="Apply Model" to_port="unlabelled data"/>
<connect from_op="Apply Model" from_port="labelled data" to_op="Performance" to_port="labelled data"/>
<connect from_op="Performance" from_port="performance" to_port="averagable 1"/>
<portSpacing port="source_model" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="source_test set" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="source_through 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_averagable 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_averagable 2" spacing="0"/>
</process>
</operator>
<connect from_op="Retrieve PR" from_port="output" to_op="Set Role" to_port="example set input"/>
<connect from_op="Set Role" from_port="example set output" to_op="Validation" to_port="training"/>
<connect from_op="Validation" from_port="model" to_port="result 1"/>
<connect from_op="Validation" from_port="averagable 1" to_port="result 2"/>
<portSpacing port="source_input 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 2" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 3" spacing="0"/>
</process>
</operator>
</process>

MartinLiebig

I tried your process and it works fine for me if i use sonar.

What do you mean with the comment:

This process loads numerical data from file and generates some attributes with the feature generation operator. The parameter list "functions" of the generation operator must be edited in order to define the functions which should be generated. Try the following: Start the process. Use breakpoints to check the generation step. The parameter "keep_all" defines if all attributes should be used for the result example set or only the newly generated ones. Edit the parameter list "functions" and add some other functions. Most of the known mathematical functions can be used.

What feature generation operator? Generate Attributes? Where do you add this?

IvanMarkus

The label of the Sonar database is nominal and it has two possible values (mine, rock)

In my case, the label is polynominal with three values (A,B,C)

The Problem Tab says: Label and prediction must be of the same type but are polynominal and nominal, respectively. Location:Performance.labelled data

The outport lab in Apply Model is:

label Y(LABEL) polynominal =[A, B, C] = 0
DifX real =[-2.097 – 2.398] = 0
prediction prediction(Y(LABEL)) nominal ⊆[A, B, C] = 0
confidence_A confidence(A) real ⊆[0 – 1] = 0
confidence_B confidence(B) real ⊆[0 – 1] = 0
confidence_C confidence(C) real ⊆[0 – 1] = 0

I send you the database file to your email for you test it. OK?

The other thing, about the comment I have no idea.

I suppose it is because I was tried some operators and then I deleted it.

But I don't generate any attributes or something like that.

Thanks

MartinLiebig

Hi,

you are right with sonar, i used your .csv file, and still it works fine for me. It might be because you are using 5.3 and i am using 6.X. I am not sure if our development worked on the meta operators? Maybe Marco can comment on it?

Cheers,
Martin

FARWA

Hi,
l have create suppoert vector model..but it give error 'Label and prediction must be of the same type but are polynominal and integer, respectively.
please guide me what to do?

varunm1

Hello @FARWA

Try adding breakpoint before performance operator, you can do so by right-clicking on the performance operator and selecting breakpoint before. Once you set the breakpoint then run the process and see in the output id the type of predictor and label are same or not. I am sure they are not same based on your error, you can check the process if you are changing the label attribute type. If you cannot resolve that, you can create a new thread and provide us with the XML code from XML window (View --> Show Panel --> XML) and also data if possible.

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/6038102/uploads/editor/7i/50awbxtugv0k.png

Quick Links

Upcoming Events

Comparing PWM control strategies - Impact on E-Motor performance
Join us for a community conversation on Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), a fundamental technique in electric motor control, and explore how different PWM strategies can yield significantly different results. This webinar provides a comparative analysis of various PWM methods and their effects on motor efficiency, torque…
Advanced Iterative Solver (AIS) for large models in Simcenter Feko
Join us for a community conversation to discover the Advanced Iterative Solver(AIS) in Simcenter Feko and its application to electrically large and computationally demanding electromagnetic models. The session will provide a general overview of how iterative solution methods can help improve efficiency of large scale…
Advancing power electronics design with Simcenter PSIM and High-Performance Computing
Join us for a community conversation on how High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Simcenter PSIM work together to meet the increasing demands of modern power electronics simulation. During this one-hour technical session, you'll discover how leveraging HPC can speed up simulations, improve scalability, and empower engineers…

View all community events