🎉Community Raffle - Win $25

An exclusive raffle opportunity for active members like you! Complete your profile, answer questions and get your first accepted badge to enter the raffle.
Join and Win

Constraint Definition

User: "hiranwale_bharat"
Altair Community Member
Updated by hiranwale_bharat

Hello everyone,

 

Is it possible to give constraint in only on direction (like the body is constrained in positive x direction but free in negative x direction)?

 

Regards,

Bharat

Find more posts tagged with

Sort by:
1 - 4 of 41
    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    Hi Bharat,

     

    What is the use case and what is the type of analysis you are simulating?

    User: "tinh"
    Altair Community Member
    Updated by tinh

    Hello everyone,

     

    Is it possible to give constraint in only on direction (like the body is constrained in positive x direction but free in negative x direction)?

     

    Regards,

    Bharat

     

    Hi,

    CGAP elements may help you in this case

    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    All,

     

    If the physics of the problem allows, here is the procedure to accomplish: 

    1. Create a duplicate node and translate it along positive X direction (any small distance.) 
    2. Create a gap element such that N1--> N2 is directed in positive X direction. (Make sure to place the gap element in separate collector) 
    3. Create a PGAP property and assign it to the CGAP element. 
    4. Card edit the PGAP property and enter KB = 2E+20 (basically a high value) 

    This will restrict the motion of the node (N1) in positive X direction. 

    User: "hiranwale_bharat"
    Altair Community Member
    OP
    Updated by hiranwale_bharat

    Hello Prakash and tinh,

     

    Thanks for the reply.

    Regards

    Bharat