velocity outlet (or mass flow outlet) boundary condition

Unknown
edited May 20 in Community Q&A

Hello experts,

 

I have been working on a problem that requires me to use velocity or mass flow outlet boundary condition. Is it possible to do so in any Altair products? Or, if this feature is not available in the GUI, is it possible to do modify the input file and use it?

 

Thanks.

Best Answer

  • acupro
    acupro
    Altair Employee
    edited May 20 Answer ✓

    Thank you for your reply.

     

    I was able to do as you stated earlier. But the thing is that when I used advanced boundaries, I was not able to get the surface output (integrated) values for that outlet.

    When you apply Advanced Boundaries settings, it removes the surface from the 'standard' boundaries.  You can define Surface Monitors (Surface Output) from the Solution ribbon.

    My typical recommendation:

    Create a Surface Monitor for the Surface Output, and to get the surface set definition/name.

    Advance Boundaries > Surface Integrated Condition (SIC) to specify mass flow rate (positive value exits domain, negative value enters domain)

    Manually edit the input file to add Simple Boundary Condition type = outflow for that outlet surface - this takes care of the rest of the boundary condition set.

Answers

  • James Lewis
    James Lewis Altair Community Member
    edited May 20

    Hi Prabin,

     

    You can try Advance Boundaries conditions --> NBC (node boundary condition) to setup for that surface.

     

     

    image

    image

  • Unknown
    edited May 20

    Hi Prabin,

     

    You can try Advance Boundaries conditions --> NBC (node boundary condition) to setup for that surface.

     

     

    image

    image

    Thank you for your reply.

     

    I was able to do as you stated earlier. But the thing is that when I used advanced boundaries, I was not able to get the surface output (integrated) values for that outlet.

  • acupro
    acupro
    Altair Employee
    edited May 20 Answer ✓

    Thank you for your reply.

     

    I was able to do as you stated earlier. But the thing is that when I used advanced boundaries, I was not able to get the surface output (integrated) values for that outlet.

    When you apply Advanced Boundaries settings, it removes the surface from the 'standard' boundaries.  You can define Surface Monitors (Surface Output) from the Solution ribbon.

    My typical recommendation:

    Create a Surface Monitor for the Surface Output, and to get the surface set definition/name.

    Advance Boundaries > Surface Integrated Condition (SIC) to specify mass flow rate (positive value exits domain, negative value enters domain)

    Manually edit the input file to add Simple Boundary Condition type = outflow for that outlet surface - this takes care of the rest of the boundary condition set.

  • Unknown
    edited May 20

    When you apply Advanced Boundaries settings, it removes the surface from the 'standard' boundaries.  You can define Surface Monitors (Surface Output) from the Solution ribbon.

    My typical recommendation:

    Create a Surface Monitor for the Surface Output, and to get the surface set definition/name.

    Advance Boundaries > Surface Integrated Condition (SIC) to specify mass flow rate (positive value exits domain, negative value enters domain)

    Manually edit the input file to add Simple Boundary Condition type = outflow for that outlet surface - this takes care of the rest of the boundary condition set.

    What if I specify 'profiled inflow' at the outlet and use negative value? Does this work and still act as the outflow?

  • acupro
    acupro
    Altair Employee
    edited May 20

    What if I specify 'profiled inflow' at the outlet and use negative value? Does this work and still act as the outflow?

    It would be similar.  However those inflow types (average velocity, mass flow rate) also adjust a profile to the turbulence quantities.  Neither is exactly ideal, since they both develop a velocity profile.