Buckling constraints & topology optimization

Altair Forum User

Hello, 

 

I am trying to run topology optimization on rod elements. The optimization response would be buckling. I have two questions:

1) I am not clear about the upper and lower constraints for buckling response. Are they buckling load factors? What should I consider to define such constraint for buckling?

2) During the analysis and optimization, I am supposed to keep the length to diameter ratio greater than or equal to 10. How can I implement this as a constraint? 

 

Thank you in advance,

 

Muge Candogan

Altair Forum User

Hi @Muge Candogan

 

Buckling values are the buckling factors. Use the buckling factors for upper and lower bounds

Since you are doing a topology optimization, here is a note from OptiStruct help:

There are several barriers for buckling constraints in topology optimization:

1.

Buckling constraints are conditional, similar to stress constraints. Structural instability does not exist when structural parts vanish. This results in the phenomenon of 'singular topology,' where sudden changes of the feasible design domain occur when the density of a design element approaches zero.  Gradient based optimization algorithms cannot overcome this barrier. For example, structural stability might be most critical around an opening in a panel. Instead of removing material from the boundary to improve the shape of the opening, the optimization process usually tends to try to add material to the boundary to improve the stability. This prevents the finding of more meaningful topology and shape.

2.	Although low density material might have very little impact to structural stiffness, it can significantly impact the buckling load limits; often times a small amount of lateral support can significantly improve structural stability.

3.	Buckling modes in vanishing areas (low density zones) have no implication to the structural integrity. How to effectively filter out these buckling modes remains another challenging task for buckling constraints.

Because of the above reasons, for the time being, reasonable success can only be expected for one class of design problems -- shell structures with non-zero base thickness.

Altair Forum User

Hi @Prakash Pagadala

 

Thank you so much for your response.

 

Another question that confuses me is: During the analysis and optimization, I am supposed to keep the length to diameter ratio greater than or equal to 10. How can I implement this as a constraint? 

 

Thank you in advance,

 

Muge Candogan

Altair Forum User

Hi @Muge Candogan

 

I will check and let you know.

Altair Forum User

Altair Forum User said:

Hi @Muge Candogan

 

I will check and let you know.

Thanks @Prakash Pagadala