The Siemens Community Catalyst program was co-created with our community to acknowledge technology leaders who consistently contribute to the Siemens Community. Nominations are accepted on a rolling basis.
Can any explain the pros and cons of using Igap2 vs Igap3 in type 7 contact (crash analysis)?
Thanks.
Hi Ray,
Size of the mesh is taken into account to avoid initial penetration if you use Igap= 3, but this is not the case with Igap= 2
Thank you Prakash for your reply.
The explanation for Igap explains the mesh size consideration. I was wondering if this has been explained in theory of how the Contact algorithm works and the effects of the Igap parameter on the overall simulation- contact, energy balance and the difference in the results.
This is available on RADIOSS help, but effects are not.
If Igap=3, a variable gap is computed as:
Join us for a community conversation on how High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Simcenter PSIM work together to meet the increasing demands of modern power electronics simulation. During this one-hour technical session, you'll discover how leveraging HPC can speed up simulations, improve scalability, and empower engineers…
Join us for a community conversation on accelerating your motor simulation workflow with Simcenter Simlab. In this beginner-friendly session, we'll introduce the platform's automated model-building capabilities and show how easy it is to set up your first electric motor analysis. You'll see the basic steps of geometry…
Join us for a Community Conversation where we'll discuss practical approaches to analyzing complex electromagnetic models using hybrid solver techniques. This session will provide a general overview of how different computational methods can be combined within a single simulation to address models containing varied…