An issue concerning the use of “Double NeGative” (DNG) metamaterials

Altair Forum User
Altair Forum User
Altair Employee
edited October 2020 in Community Q&A

Dear All,

I have an issue concerning the use of “Double NeGative” (DNG) metamaterials. The issue regards either the electromagnetic scattering of plane waves from DNG metamaterial cylinders or the evaluation of the reflection coefficient for waveguides partially filled with metamaterials.

I firstly considered an indefinite (along the z axis), homogeneous cylinder having radius = 4lambda in the case of normally incident plane wave with TM polarization at f = 300MHz (see Fig. 1 in attached files). The cylinder is filled up with a DNG metamaterial having eps_r= -2.2, while mu_r<0 changes from case to case. An indefinite cylinder has been obtained with periodic boundary conditions.
The result from FEKO is compared with a cylindrical wave expansion (see “Normal Incidence Plane Wave Scattering by Conducting Circular Cylinder: TMzPolarization” – Advanced Engineering Electromagnetic, Constantine A. Balanis).
FEKO and the cylindrical wave expansion agree for mu_r =-1 (see Fig. 2) and for mu_r = -1.2 (see Fig. 3), while they disagree for mu_r= -1.3 and mu_r = -1.5 (see Fig. 4 and Fig. 5).
Please, find attached the related .cfx file and relative figures.
 

In the second case, I considered an X-band rectangular waveguide structure (see Fig.6) partially filled with a DNG metamaterial, now with epr_r = -2 and mu_r<0 changing from case to case, and terminated with a short circuit. The result from FEKO has been compared with waveguide theory. While for mu_r from -1 to  -1.2 the reflection coefficient is ok, for mu_r = -1.5 (or in general lower than mu_r=-1.3) the phases of the numerical and analytical reflection coefficients differ: the numerical phase is -79.7° while the analytical one is -105.1°.
Again, the .cfx file is attached.

Thank you very much for any help.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Fig. 1 - cilindro vista alto.JPG

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Fig. 2 - cfr_metacyl_DNG_epsr_22_mur_1_.jpg

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Fig. 3 - cfr_metacyl_DNG_epsr_22_mur_12_.jpg

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Fig. 4 - cfr_metacyl_DNG_epsr_22_mur_13_.jpg

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Fig. 5 - cfr_metacyl_DNG_epsr_22_mur_15_.jpg

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Fig. 6 - WG_rect.JPG

Unable to find an attachment - read this blog

Tagged: