Composite optimization-Step3: shuffle optimization and cae-modelling

Digital_MM
Digital_MM New Altair Community Member
edited November 2020 in Community Q&A

Hello!

As a part of the student project I perform the composite optimization of the composite structure (fig.1- Composite structure).

image

I have a few questions:

1)When I specify interface surfaces according to books and manuals, there is an error (Fig.2-3,4) in displaying plies when modeling an external closed skin.

Is it?

  • A display error and is there a possibility to compute correctly
  •  An error in which correct computation cannot be performed
  •  …..?

Is it necessary to change the strategy of CAE-modelling? Could you suggest any options to solve this problem?

image

image

image

Noticed Feature:

I choose the strategy of CAE-modelling (Fig. 5 - Element’s normal and sublaminates, fig.6-7 ply’s normal for sublaminates №2-3).

image

imageimage

When I use 1 ply for sublaminates №4,5 then I have the display error (Fig. 8), but when I use 2 plies for sublaminates №2,3,4,5 or 3 plies (Fig. 9), or 2 plies for sublaminates №2,3 and 3 plies for sublaminates № 4,5 (Fig. 9) then display is correct (interfaces laminate is the same). If I compute with this display error, the results will be correct or not?

image

image

  1. Is it possible to set links for plies of different sublaminates when performing shuffle optimization? How can I do it?

        For ex. The dependent i-Layer# of sublaminate #1 must be laid similarly to the leading j-layer of the sublaminate #2 (Fig.10)

image

    3. There is the following error when assigning a Sublaminate to a dshuffle variable: fig.11-12. Is it possible to assign Sublaminate for a dshuffle variable?

image

image

I would be grateful for your help!

Answers

  • Thomas Quenaon_21507
    Thomas Quenaon_21507 New Altair Community Member
    edited November 2020

    Hi,

     

    Thank you for your interest on Composite Optimization.

    1- Using Sublaminate is a way to create a stacking with our ply-based method. Your problem may be more suited to the use of zone based method. 

    We propose both methods (zone-based + play-based) in HyperMesh to let the user choose the easiest to set up.

    2- What would be the purpose ? Shuffle Optimization is only here the reorder the composite stacking in order to improuve its behaviour.

    Options available for Shuffle Optimization are :

    • MAXSUCC constraint indicates that the stacking sequence should contain no sections with more than a given number of successive plies with the same orientation
    • PAIR constraint indicates that 45° and -45° plies should be paired together
    • The CORE and COVER constraints specify stacking sequences for the core and cover layers, respectively. Plies are listed from the bottom surface upward, in respect to the element's normal direction

    3- Here you have to select laminates for stacks.

     

    BR-

    Thomas