Split Validation within Backward Elimination
Muhammed_Fatih_
New Altair Community Member
Hello together,
I am currently executing a Backward Elimination with contains a simple Naive Bayes by using Split Validation. But the subprocess is iterativeley working by switching between the milestones Naive Bayes --> Apply Model --> Performance and subsequently again starts with Naive Bayes (see attached).
Is this procesdure normal?
Thank you in advance for your answers!
Best regards,
Fatih
I am currently executing a Backward Elimination with contains a simple Naive Bayes by using Split Validation. But the subprocess is iterativeley working by switching between the milestones Naive Bayes --> Apply Model --> Performance and subsequently again starts with Naive Bayes (see attached).
Is this procesdure normal?
Thank you in advance for your answers!
Best regards,
Fatih
Tagged:
0
Best Answer
-
Hi Fatih,
in the Validation operators (Split and Cross Validation) you see an output called "ave". This is a bit confusing, but if you move the mouse on it you will see that it expects performance vectors. It could use multiple performances, so for RapidMiner it's a separate type. But you can still use it with the result of the Performance operator.
Regards,
Balázs
1
Answers
-
Hi,
yes, this is a normal procedure.
You can also use the Split Validation operator with the same operators inside: on the left side your learner (Naive Bayes), and on the right side Apply Model and Performance. This would be equivalent to your solution.
Regards,
Balázs0 -
Hi @BalazsBarany,
thank you for your answer. I tried this but the outgoing link of Split Validation has no "per" which is necessary for the subprocess of BackwardElimination.
Do you have a solution for this?
Best regards,
Fatih0 -
Hi Fatih,
in the Validation operators (Split and Cross Validation) you see an output called "ave". This is a bit confusing, but if you move the mouse on it you will see that it expects performance vectors. It could use multiple performances, so for RapidMiner it's a separate type. But you can still use it with the result of the Performance operator.
Regards,
Balázs
1