Testing of Automodel

ssv112

Hi, 
I have created machine learning classification models using Automodel and want to test the sample data using retrieve operator and putting it as unlabelled data in Apply operator instead of  unlabelled data coming from split validation operator. I am getting an error as shown but no error is coming through split validation unlabelled data.

As shown, with split data validation ( for testing samples) , process runs smoothly but ... it shows 


This error comes when i use random sample data by retrieve function.. as shown..




Any help is appreciated..


Thanks

varunm1

@mschmitz yes there are issues in this and we changed it through a conversation in direct messages.

varunm1

Hello @ssv112

Can you provide the XML code of the modified process? This might be due to the modification you did. Inside the "performance for Hold out sets' there is a Log scoring times operator if you are not logging anything here due to the changes it might throw an error like this.

ssv112

Hi varun!

attaching xml code


Thanks for your help!

varunm1

Hello @ssv112

Sorry, I am not sure why my RM is not retrieving your process from XML. Can you please save it and export it into .rmp file and attach it here?

Thanks

ssv112

Attaching .rmp file

varunm1

Hello @ssv112

This looks fine for me (logging part in process), but I cannot test as I don't have data. I have a couple of questions (If you can provide data, I can test otherwise you can debug based on my points).

1. Can you set a breakpoint after the "Log Scoring Time" inside "performance hold out sets" by right-clicking on "Log Scoring Time" operator. Also, set a breakpoint before and after this "Scoring Time as data" to see if there is an input coming into this operator.

(OR)

2. If you do not want the run times. You can simply disable the "Collect Runtimes" subprocess by right-clicking it and remove Enable. This won't show the runtimes but it will run the process without this error.

MartinLiebig

Hi,

to me this looks like the ordering of the operators is wrong.  Can you please check if it is the right one?

See: https://community.rapidminer.com/discussion/50288/change-the-execution-order-of-processes

Cheers,

Martin

varunm1

@mschmitz yes there are issues in this and we changed it through a conversation in direct messages.

ssv112

Thanks very much varun! you guys are very helpful! Looking to learn a lot from you..



Regards,
ssv112