nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Siemens Community Catalyst Program

The Siemens Community Catalyst program was co-created with our community to acknowledge technology leaders who consistently contribute to the Siemens Community. Nominations are accepted on a rolling basis.

Nominate Now

linear regression optimization

dkpengqiuyang

Greeting,

I need to predict thermal expand range from tempreture, and I get a test dataset, so I try the linear regression but the result is not good, my setting and data is like below, can you help me to improve the prediction ? thanks.

Find more posts tagged with

AI Studio

Regression

Accepted answers

earmijo

From looking at the scatter plot of the two variables you get a sense that there are other important predictors missing from this equation. There is non-linearity so you could use other methods instead of plain vanilla linear regression.

Investigate further the physics of the process. I know absolutely nothing and Wikipidea tells me pressure is another important variable.

Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 9.07.39 AM.png

All comments

binsetyawan

you can use optimization parameter (grid)operator to get the best parameter for your dataset

earmijo

Investigate further the physics of the process. I know absolutely nothing and Wikipidea tells me pressure is another important variable.

Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 9.07.39 AM.png

dkpengqiuyang

my friend do the same job with matlab and the result is well fit the test data , but I can not take the same score with rapidminer. I am still confused about this ...

1.png

Thomas_Ott

Can you post your RapidMiner process? Maybe we can help troubleshoot.

dkpengqiuyang

hi,

you can see the rm process and operator setting in the attachment above, and the origin data is also there.

I can get a simular output like matlab, when I change the input attribute from "tempreture" to "tempreture change", which means y=kx+b do not work but y=k(x-x1)+b works well in rm, while y=kx+b works well in matlab.

I am confused about this.

YYH

@dkpengqiuyang did you try to delete collinear feature?

Process is attached here.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><process version="7.6.000">
  <operator activated="true" class="retrieve" compatibility="7.6.000" expanded="true" height="68" name="Retrieve regression" width="90" x="45" y="34">
    <parameter key="repository_entry" value="//RM YY Local Repository/AAA-PROSPECT/data/regression"/>
  </operator>
</process>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><process version="7.6.000">
  <operator activated="true" class="set_role" compatibility="7.6.000" expanded="true" height="82" name="Set Role" width="90" x="179" y="34">
    <parameter key="attribute_name" value="thermal expand"/>
    <parameter key="target_role" value="label"/>
    <list key="set_additional_roles"/>
  </operator>
</process>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><process version="7.6.000">
  <operator activated="true" class="linear_regression" compatibility="7.6.000" expanded="true" height="103" name="Linear Regression" width="90" x="380" y="34">
    <parameter key="feature_selection" value="M5 prime"/>
    <parameter key="alpha" value="0.05"/>
    <parameter key="max_iterations" value="10"/>
    <parameter key="forward_alpha" value="0.05"/>
    <parameter key="backward_alpha" value="0.05"/>
    <parameter key="eliminate_colinear_features" value="false"/>
    <parameter key="min_tolerance" value="0.05"/>
    <parameter key="use_bias" value="true"/>
    <parameter key="ridge" value="1.0E-8"/>
  </operator>
</process>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><process version="7.6.000">
  <operator activated="true" class="apply_model" compatibility="7.6.000" expanded="true" height="82" name="Apply Model" width="90" x="514" y="34">
    <list key="application_parameters"/>
    <parameter key="create_view" value="false"/>
  </operator>
</process>

Quick Links

Upcoming Events

Advancing power electronics design with Simcenter PSIM and High-Performance Computing
Join us for a community conversation on how High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Simcenter PSIM work together to meet the increasing demands of modern power electronics simulation. During this one-hour technical session, you'll discover how leveraging HPC can speed up simulations, improve scalability, and empower engineers…
Getting Started with Faster Motor Building in Simcenter Simlab
Join us for a community conversation on accelerating your motor simulation workflow with Simcenter Simlab. In this beginner-friendly session, we'll introduce the platform's automated model-building capabilities and show how easy it is to set up your first electric motor analysis. You'll see the basic steps of geometry…
Practical hybrid solver workflows in Simcenter Feko
Join us for a Community Conversation where we'll discuss practical approaches to analyzing complex electromagnetic models using hybrid solver techniques. This session will provide a general overview of how different computational methods can be combined within a single simulation to address models containing varied…

View all community events