surface graph plotting issue
I have RCS data of model that I had, and I tried to visualize RCS of the data that I had.
the RCS data was calcurated in multiple phi and theta, so it is 3 - dimensional data.
To visualize it, I tried to use Surface graph plotting method in altair feko, but the result is not correct.
as I attached the image, this one has too many 0.0 or values around -5.0.
but the real data doesn't have that much values.
What is the problem? is it due to feko software's internal visualization problem?
Answers
-
Hi Yun,
Can you share the data file so that I can test?
Thanks,
Zeina
0 -
Zeina said:
Hi Yun,
Can you share the data file so that I can test?
Thanks,
Zeina
I attach my postfeko pfs file. if you need original cfx file, let me know and I will attach it
0 -
Zeina said:
Hi Yun,
Can you share the data file so that I can test?
Thanks,
Zeina
here is the zip file containing ffe file
0 -
Yun_20312 said:
here is the zip file containing ffe file
Hi Yun,
I don't see any issue with the plots. Here are some points I have randomly picked from a surface plot of the data. You'll see that all three values were correctly plotted.Note that the RCS values in the .ffe file are in m^2 and not in dBsm.
If you have specific points where you have observed discrepancies between the data and the plot. Please share their info.
0 -
Zeina said:
Hi Yun,
I don't see any issue with the plots. Here are some points I have randomly picked from a surface plot of the data. You'll see that all three values were correctly plotted.Note that the RCS values in the .ffe file are in m^2 and not in dBsm.
If you have specific points where you have observed discrepancies between the data and the plot. Please share their info.
I cheked the .dat file I exported with m^2 surface graph, and confirmed there is no issue in RCS value in .dat file. RCS values are all the same with .ffe file.
but what I thouht wrong was surface graph of dB, not m^2.
could you check RCS value from dB version of surface graph? if you could, export graph to .dat file and see RCS values. mine is:
as you see, there are pointless -4.0 values, which is totally wrong.
this one is showing results converted from m^2 to dBsm.
0 -
Yun_20312 said:
I cheked the .dat file I exported with m^2 surface graph, and confirmed there is no issue in RCS value in .dat file. RCS values are all the same with .ffe file.
but what I thouht wrong was surface graph of dB, not m^2.
could you check RCS value from dB version of surface graph? if you could, export graph to .dat file and see RCS values. mine is:
as you see, there are pointless -4.0 values, which is totally wrong.
this one is showing results converted from m^2 to dBsm.
Hi Yun,
Interestingly, I do not have the same values as you when exporting to .dat:
What version/subversion are you using?
0 -
Zeina said:
Hi Yun,
Interestingly, I do not have the same values as you when exporting to .dat:
What version/subversion are you using?
I'm using Altair FEKO 2019.3.3, which is quite old version.
so far I thouhgt even though I use old version there is no issue, but seems there are bug / software error when converting m^2 value to dBsm.
0 -
Yun_20312 said:
I'm using Altair FEKO 2019.3.3, which is quite old version.
so far I thouhgt even though I use old version there is no issue, but seems there are bug / software error when converting m^2 value to dBsm.
Indeed, your version is very old. I strongly recommend you update. A lot of enhancements and feature additions have been added since.
Best Regards,
Zeina
0