The Siemens Community Catalyst program was co-created with our community to acknowledge technology leaders who consistently contribute to the Siemens Community. Nominations are accepted on a rolling basis.
<operator name="Root" class="Process" expanded="yes"> <operator name="ExampleSetGenerator" class="ExampleSetGenerator"> <parameter key="attributes_lower_bound" value="0.0"/> <parameter key="target_function" value="sum"/> </operator> <operator name="NoiseGenerator" class="NoiseGenerator"> <list key="noise"> </list> </operator> <operator name="Label2Regular" class="ChangeAttributeRole"> <parameter key="name" value="label"/> </operator> <operator name="Normalization" class="Normalization"> <parameter key="return_preprocessing_model" value="true"/> </operator> <operator name="Regular2Label" class="ChangeAttributeRole"> <parameter key="name" value="label"/> <parameter key="target_role" value="label"/> </operator> <operator name="LinearRegression" class="LinearRegression"> <parameter key="keep_example_set" value="true"/> </operator> <operator name="ModelApplier" class="ModelApplier"> <list key="application_parameters"> </list> </operator> <operator name="ChangeAttributeName" class="ChangeAttributeName"> <parameter key="new_name" value="pred"/> <parameter key="old_name" value="prediction(label)"/> </operator> <operator name="FeatureGeneration" class="FeatureGeneration"> <list key="functions"> <parameter key="mult_pred" value="*(pred,sqrt(const[47.175602123229964]()))"/> <parameter key="transformed_pred" value="+(mult_pred,const[24.811560028833878]())"/> </list> <parameter key="keep_all" value="true"/> </operator></operator>
Dear Ingo
Would it be OK to apply normalization only to the regular (predictor) attributes and not to the label (prediction)?
Regards
Ben
Hello @cyborghijacker -
Just FYI about the forum...if you want to call someone's attention, use the @ handle with the username. Very effective.
Scott
My wife considers me 'de-normalized!' yuk yuk yuk!
Why doesn't the "de-normalize" operator work for you in this case? You just need to feed the original normalize preprocessing model into it and it returns the invert model, which can then be applied to the normalized data and you should get the denormalized data back out.
I see, but I am still somewhat confused. Consider the process below to train a model and then to be used on new data. How to connect such that the new data is similar normalized using the normalization model obtained by the trained data, then the Deep Learning model applies on it to generate the prediction, followed by a de-normalize operator to get it back to its initial (unnormalized value)? I hope my process is sound though.
@sgenzer Thank you. I just used it!
Maybe this thread helps: http://community.rapidminer.com/t5/RapidMiner-Studio-Forum/Reverse-map-a-nominal-to-numerical-transform/m-p/39662
Join us for a community conversation on how High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Simcenter PSIM work together to meet the increasing demands of modern power electronics simulation. During this one-hour technical session, you'll discover how leveraging HPC can speed up simulations, improve scalability, and empower engineers…
Join us for a community conversation on accelerating your motor simulation workflow with Simcenter Simlab. In this beginner-friendly session, we'll introduce the platform's automated model-building capabilities and show how easy it is to set up your first electric motor analysis. You'll see the basic steps of geometry…
Join us for a Community Conversation where we'll discuss practical approaches to analyzing complex electromagnetic models using hybrid solver techniques. This session will provide a general overview of how different computational methods can be combined within a single simulation to address models containing varied…