A program to recognize and reward our most engaged community members
In the example laid out in ACUSOLVE documentation,
what would be the pressure specified at this boundary condition?
The pressure solution at the inlet would be the result of the calculation - not specified as a boundary condition. We specify a flow BC (velocity, flow rate, etc) or a pressure BC - but not both. The pressure is typically specified at the outflow boundary - and there the velocity/flow-rate would be the unknown being solved.
Thanks for the information, I would like to try specifying both velocity and pressure at the inlet, with a 0-pres. gradient at the outlet. This way I would hope to remove outlet boundary condition effects on the solution.
This would overspecify the conditions at the inlet - likely leading to poor convergence (if at all) and spurious results. The typical outflow boundary condition with a specified pressure applies that pressure as an 'Element Boundary Condition' so the solver attempts to reach that in averaged sense, not applying that pressure at every node. It's a more natural/conservative boundary condition, as the flow distribution is resolved.
What is your desired simulation? Can you add some explanation and images?
Thanks, I did not realize that outflow is treated like a natural boundary condition.
I am trying to simulate flow past a square cylinder. Here is a link to the Article that I've been following,
Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Around a Finite-Height Wall-Mounted Square Cylinder Within a Thin Boundary Layer | Request PDF (researchgate.net)
where d = 0.0127m, Uinf = 15 m/s
Thanks, I did not realize that outflow is treated like a natural boundary condition. I am trying to simulate flow past a square cylinder. Here is a link to the Article that I've been following, Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Around a Finite-Height Wall-Mounted Square Cylinder Within a Thin Boundary Layer | Request PDF (researchgate.net) where d = 0.0127m, Uinf = 15 m/s
I think we already accomplished the task for the inlet velocity profile.You'll likely need a very (or very, very, very) refined mesh for LES simulations. Have you looked at mesh sensitivity, time increment/step sensitivity, inlet turbulence sensitivity, etc?
I have tried running a simulation with about 15 million volumetric elements (the same as what was applied in the paper), with a refinement so that the surface Y+ at any given time is less than 10. My time stepping is done to achieve a CFL of less than 10, as well as adding second order time integration to help allow a higher CFL.