The Siemens Community Catalyst program was co-created with our community to acknowledge technology leaders who consistently contribute to the Siemens Community. Nominations are accepted on a rolling basis.
INSPIRE CAST 2020.1.1
Mesh fails, could not find the reason.
Selected Mesh average size = 8 mm
Link for run directory files: https://we.tl/t-G9SSjlAbzu
Please advise
Hi Uri,
kindly let me know what type error are you getting or if you can share a snapshot.
Regards,
Sourav
I would recommend you to use a higher element size, for such a big size component. or you can use Run virtual mold.
Regards
I was able to run the virtual mold.
Got an error message while running Virtual mold.
1. Link to the last file version https://we.tl/t-QV227Di0LU
Got an error message while running Virtual mold. 1. Link to the last file version https://we.tl/t-QV227Di0LU Please advise. please send me the icust file that you managed to run.
In the run dialog, there is an advance tab and in that, there is a mesh component factor, reduce the riser factor. This may solve your problem.
Also PFA file in the link: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/5cfbf54f19cb3395da4c27aa1614662e20201202131401/07feb1
Hello
I got the same error (try decreasing the minimum thickness) with the file you managed to run.
1. Please keep in mind that your version is higher then mine. (Mine is 2020.1.1)
2. What were the mesh parameters that you used?
3. Please advise, (Foundry is waiting...)
I decreased the risers mesh factor to 0.6 (Using virtual mold file: https://we.tl/t-QV227Di0LU)
Got the same error message (try decreasing the minimum thickness part 191)
Please advise.
Reduced the average mesh size from 8 mm to 6 mm. (Virtual mold)
Now getting the message below without additional details
Link for the Run Folder: https://we.tl/t-XmvozXhfJh
CLEAN FILE casting only, no fill, chills risers etc
Link: https://we.tl/t-rwsqSGOxqW
Getting the same error.
PFA link:
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/5cfbf54f19cb3395da4c27aa1614662e20201202131401/b60e0b7f413efbfbb77201a32528d00320201202131401/f57afb
Hello Sourav
Thanks for responses.
1. Did you use Virtual mold?
2. What mesh parameters did you use?
Most of my simulations were with average thickness 8 mm and all failed.
Now I am running the simulation, (all items included) with element size 8 mm. Mesh is O.K
Thanks again.
Uri.
Hello Sourav Thanks for responses. 1. Did you use Virtual mold? 2. What mesh parameters did you use? Most of my simulations were with average thickness 8 mm and all failed. Now I am running the simulation, (all items included) with element size 8 mm. Mesh is O.K Thanks again. Uri.
1. Yes Virtual mold with 8mm mesh size.
I also did one simulation with mesh parameter 6 mm without Virtual mold, which I have sent you via WeTransfer (https://we.tl/t-Y4VyaO7qDu).
What is the accuracy difference in results between mold and virtual mold?
Join us for a community conversation on how High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Simcenter PSIM work together to meet the increasing demands of modern power electronics simulation. During this one-hour technical session, you'll discover how leveraging HPC can speed up simulations, improve scalability, and empower engineers…
Join us for a community conversation on accelerating your motor simulation workflow with Simcenter Simlab. In this beginner-friendly session, we'll introduce the platform's automated model-building capabilities and show how easy it is to set up your first electric motor analysis. You'll see the basic steps of geometry…
Join us for a Community Conversation where we'll discuss practical approaches to analyzing complex electromagnetic models using hybrid solver techniques. This session will provide a general overview of how different computational methods can be combined within a single simulation to address models containing varied…
