Error ID 44: Abnormal End/ Missing Normal Termination
Altair EmployeeAnswers
-
hello!
it's difficult model.
why did you use quasi-static analysis?
i doesn't see spotweld connection.
0 -
Is it correct to use velocity in static analysis?=) What do you think?
0 -
the problem is in connection. i'm not good in altair solvers, i can't repair it, but connections are uncorrect, so i think.
0 -
Hi,
Welds are not realized. You can use rigids instead.
or
Can you run the same in OptiStruct with LGDISP?
0 -
your units are mm, s, tonn-> MPa, N.
but these moduls are suspicious.
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
Is it correct to use velocity in static analysis?=) What do you think?
It is a quasi static analysis and the velocity is very low with 10 mm/min. I thought this should work.
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
your units are mm, s, tonn-> MPa, N.
but these moduls are suspicious.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
Thanks. I have changed these values. But the analysis is still not running. Also I have deleted the unrealized welds. But its still not working.
0 -
Altair Forum User said:
Thanks. I have changed these values. But the analysis is still not running. Also I have deleted the unrealized welds. But its still not working.
i did this thing yesterday=) it still haven't worked too)
i separeted model. i am seaching mistakes in up part (ply).
0 -
it's interesting.
i did that i said about in up post, but have taken explct solver.
it works!
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
0 -
0
-
yes, i have written in up post that connectors doesn't work.
0 -
but i didn't check it in explct.
0 -
OK, I think with the unrealized connector the explicit solving will fail too.
Instead, try with OptiStruct LGDISP.
0 -
it's not my issue=)
@xyz is topic starter.
0 -
/emoticons/default_smile.png' srcset='/emoticons/smile@2x.png 2x' title=':)' width='20'> just a suggestion
0
