Doubts regarding topology optimization

Altair Forum User
Altair Forum User
Altair Employee
edited November 2020 in Community Q&A

Hello,

I have been working on Topology optimization on a solid cylindrical structure of thickness 20mm.(trial)

Objective: To minimise mass

Contraint: deflection < 20mm

responses: mass and deflection.

Is it possible to carry out topology optimization ? An error shown on the output file.Screen shot of  output file is attached here. Please help me.

 

Unable to find an attachment - read this blog

Answers

  • Girish Mudigonda_21018
    Girish Mudigonda_21018
    Altair Employee
    edited January 2017

    Hi Meera,

     

    As the error mentioned, please check for any RBM. Make sure you constrained all degrees of freedom.

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited January 2017

    Ok. Also after optimization my structure has no continuity.How to force a constant cross section along a given direction in optistruct

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Hi @meera

     

    An image would help to understand your question.

     

    Anyways, you can play with ISO value for better design. If this did not help, you can add manufacturing constraints like minimum and maximum membersize, grouping patterns, etc...

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited November 2020

    Hai,

    In my output file, error -topology optimization cannot be performed due to possible rigid body mode. Please help me to solve the problem. Here i attached the screenshot of my model.

    Unable to find an attachment - read this blog

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Meera,

     

    Kindly provide the .fem file or .hm file which has all optimization and analysis setup instead of raw geometry file.

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited November 2020

    Here attached .fem file. Please help me.

    Unable to find an attachment - read this blog

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Hai, in my outputfile error: In static load case 1 ,the compliance is negative or large 3.33976e+008.
     Optimization/buckling analysis cannot be performed due to possible rigid body mode.
     FEASIBLE DESIGN (ALL CONSTRAINTS SATISFIED). What is the reason? Please help me

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    helloo...

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Hi Meera,

     

    Sorry for a late reply, the model is taking long time to run on my local machine.

     

    I think some how the bottom material from the designable component is removed and this is what make it too compliance to the applied load. 

     

    Maybe you can try with adding minimum and maximum member size constraints to your model and try again.

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    K . Thank you. I will try.

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Hai, in my outputfile,  error: In static load case 1 ,the compliance is negative or large 3.33976e+008.
     Optimization/buckling analysis cannot be performed due to possible rigid body mode.
     FEASIBLE DESIGN (ALL CONSTRAINTS SATISFIED). What is the reason? Please help me .

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Hi meera,

     

    I tried to have a look but it's too much for my laptop.

    In such a simple model you should reduce drasticly the element count, it would be easier to troubleshoot and then if needed increase the number of elements.

    In a topology optimization you only going to get an ideia where to put material so the element count should be much much lower, and the goal is to use as few elements as possible to achieve faster runs. Even 2D shell would give a good estimation. Then for the final static analysis increase the element count but still not that much.

     

    Best regards,

    Gonçalo

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited February 2017

    Thank you for your reply.