An exclusive raffle opportunity for active members like you! Complete your profile, answer questions and get your first accepted badge to enter the raffle.
I see the following warning:
Warning 1010: Assumptions of UTD not fulfilled
What does it mean and what should I do to fix it?
For edge diffraction within the UTD context, a largeness parameter K is defined as  K = BETA * L * SIN(Alpha_i)^2 with  BETA    wavenumber 2*pi/lambda  Alpha_i angle of the diffraction cone (i.e. angle between incident ray           and edge)  L       distance parameter, which for a spherical wavefront can be           computed from             L = R*S/(R+S) * sin(Alpha_i)^2           with             R = radius of the spherical wavefront             S = distance of the wave between the diffraction point and                 the observation point (for double diffraction then the                 distance between first and second diffraction point) For the UTD diffraction formulas to be valid, the largeness parameter K must be larger than 1. If it is too small, then typically the separation distances for double diffractions are too short, or a MoM region is too close to a UTD edge. Normally this warning 1010 is not very serious, since the other ray contributions (direct, reflected ray) would dominate.
