Composite results difference

Altair Forum User
Altair Forum User
Altair Employee
edited October 2020 in Community Q&A

Hi,

I'm wondering if there's a difference in the global results of modeling for example a composite T junction with sublaminates or without sublaminates (in this case there will be some overlapping at the junctions). I understand that the one with sublaminates represents the real piece better, but on a complex model it is more time consuming to model every junction. Is it acceptable to create a complex model without these sublaminates?

 

To clarify:

The one with sublaminates:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>interface_sub.thumb.JPG.a4aa607cb5406d2e6fd669922d1e3e33.JPG

 

The one without sublaminates:
no_sublam.JPG.c9774d9993a783bf067e51460e11662d.JPG

Thanks in advance!

 

 

 

Tagged:

Answers

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited November 2018

    Hi s3b1k3,

     

    It is always recommended to model with sub-laminates since there will be no intersections between laminates as shown in fig 2.

     

    I'm wondering if there's a difference in the global results of modeling for example a composite T junction with sublaminates or without sublaminates

    you can try this with some simple model. Compare the results with and without sub-laminates

     

    Thank you