Hello,
I would like to ask how I can define geometry-based sets instead of element-based sets in HyperMesh. Using geometry would be very helpful when remeshing, since the sets would not need to be recreated each time the mesh changes.
My question comes from defining composite plies, where a shape (set) is required. If I define the base surfaces for the ply, does that make the shape definition redundant, or is the shape still necessary?
Thank you in advance!
