Mismatch Between Impedance Matrix and Current Eigenvector
Find more posts tagged with
Altair EmployeeIn the *.str file, in this case, you can ignore the duplicate entries, although there might be sign differences - i.e. only take the first entry and disregard the 2nd one regardless of sign.
Could you please clarify what you are trying to do?
What is the purpose of exporting both the Feko MoM matrix and the solution vector and trying to correlate the two? Usually either the one or the other is exported and then processed further, but not both - if you already let Feko compute the solution, why do you still need the matrix?
Some users want to work with the MoM matrix (like eigenvector solutions for CMA with their own correlation methods etc.). They then export the *.mat file (which is the "compressed" format, i.e. only the "real" unknowns), but do not care about the solution vector.
On the other hand, exporting the fully expanded solution vector, which is not only for MoM, but includes FEM, PO etc. unknowns if available, is mostly for Feko internal purposes. These internal purposes are mainly to save the solution and re-use it in another Feko run to add further output requests later.
With the ASCII conversion utility (str2ascii) some users do also use it for e.g. computing their own radiation integrals, but then you only need the *.str file, you do not need the matrix along with it (and there might not even be a matrix like for PO).
As a side note, I noticed the model contains finite thickness of around 20 um. This can cause inaccuracies in some cases. I removed the finite the thickness and added some local mesh sizes - see the details tree for Edges and Faces where I added this.
Also it is best to center the edge port between the two sides. I just used two plates instead of 3 - that will shorten the distance of the extension beyond the dielectric, but still ensure that the edge for the port is not placed exactly on the surface of the dielectric.
In the *.str file, in this case, you can ignore the duplicate entries, although there might be sign differences - i.e. only take the first entry and disregard the 2nd one regardless of sign.
Could you please clarify what you are trying to do?
What is the purpose of exporting both the Feko MoM matrix and the solution vector and trying to correlate the two? Usually either the one or the other is exported and then processed further, but not both - if you already let Feko compute the solution, why do you still need the matrix?
Some users want to work with the MoM matrix (like eigenvector solutions for CMA with their own correlation methods etc.). They then export the *.mat file (which is the "compressed" format, i.e. only the "real" unknowns), but do not care about the solution vector.
On the other hand, exporting the fully expanded solution vector, which is not only for MoM, but includes FEM, PO etc. unknowns if available, is mostly for Feko internal purposes. These internal purposes are mainly to save the solution and re-use it in another Feko run to add further output requests later.
With the ASCII conversion utility (str2ascii) some users do also use it for e.g. computing their own radiation integrals, but then you only need the *.str file, you do not need the matrix along with it (and there might not even be a matrix like for PO).As a side note, I noticed the model contains finite thickness of around 20 um. This can cause inaccuracies in some cases. I removed the finite the thickness and added some local mesh sizes - see the details tree for Edges and Faces where I added this.
Also it is best to center the edge port between the two sides. I just used two plates instead of 3 - that will shorten the distance of the extension beyond the dielectric, but still ensure that the edge for the port is not placed exactly on the surface of the dielectric.
I'm using both the solution vector and the impedance matrix to calculate the quality factor of the antenna in Matlab using the following equations:
Q = 2w*max(We,Wm)/Prad
where We and Wm are found by
Wm = (1/8)*I^H(dX/dw + X/w)I
Wm = (1/8)*I^H(dX/dw - X/w)I
and Prad is found by
Prad = (1/2)*I^HRI
with w being omega and ^H being the complex conjugate transpose and where I is the solution vector I believe, and R + jX is the MoM impedance matrix.
I apologize if that looks sloppy, but I don't know if I can use Latex on this forum. Thank you so much for your help and for further improving the model in Feko
Altair EmployeeIn the *.str file, in this case, you can ignore the duplicate entries, although there might be sign differences - i.e. only take the first entry and disregard the 2nd one regardless of sign.
Could you please clarify what you are trying to do?
What is the purpose of exporting both the Feko MoM matrix and the solution vector and trying to correlate the two? Usually either the one or the other is exported and then processed further, but not both - if you already let Feko compute the solution, why do you still need the matrix?
Some users want to work with the MoM matrix (like eigenvector solutions for CMA with their own correlation methods etc.). They then export the *.mat file (which is the "compressed" format, i.e. only the "real" unknowns), but do not care about the solution vector.
On the other hand, exporting the fully expanded solution vector, which is not only for MoM, but includes FEM, PO etc. unknowns if available, is mostly for Feko internal purposes. These internal purposes are mainly to save the solution and re-use it in another Feko run to add further output requests later.
With the ASCII conversion utility (str2ascii) some users do also use it for e.g. computing their own radiation integrals, but then you only need the *.str file, you do not need the matrix along with it (and there might not even be a matrix like for PO).
As a side note, I noticed the model contains finite thickness of around 20 um. This can cause inaccuracies in some cases. I removed the finite the thickness and added some local mesh sizes - see the details tree for Edges and Faces where I added this.
Also it is best to center the edge port between the two sides. I just used two plates instead of 3 - that will shorten the distance of the extension beyond the dielectric, but still ensure that the edge for the port is not placed exactly on the surface of the dielectric.
Regarding the str file, you are correct in stating that the two elements are the real and imaginary parts.
Regarding the first part of your question, could you attach your model? If not, please provide a detailed description. Have you applied symmetry to the model?