Solving error (Skin Effect)
Hi there!
I'm calculating the resistance and the skin effect of different shapes of copper conductors at varying current & frecuencies. I started solving only with a frecuency multi-value scenario due to the fact that the solver trigger an error.
I would appreciate some help.
Thanks for all,
Andoni
PBEPAV_3 => Error 49, no treated error type
PBCEVL_4 => failed
PBCEVL_3 => Failed
PBERES_3 => failed
FL5RE4 => Command not executed correctly
FL5ERS => failed
FL5ERS_1 => failed
executeAlgo_c => failed
stdcom.error.SoftwareFortranException: executeAlgo_c : Execution failed.
Failed execution
at cad.core.common.error.ErrorManager.createFortranException(ErrorManager.java:163)
at cad.flux.kernel.dbmanager.FGCProjectDbWrapper.executeAlgo(Native Method)
at cad.flux.kernel.dbmanager.FGCProjectDbAdapter.executeAlgo(FGCProjectDbAdapter.java:891)
at cad.flux.kernel.dbmanager.FGCDbManager.executeAlgo(FGCDbManager.java:151)
at cad.flux.kernel.FGSupervisor.executeNativeCommand(FGSupervisor.java:2146)
at cad.flux.kernel.actions.implementation.algo.project.KSolveScenarioAction.doAction(KSolveScenarioAction.java:83)
at cad.core.common.dynamic.actions.UIActionManager.postAction(UIActionManager.java:145)
at cad.core.kernel.KernelCommon.postAction(KernelCommon.java:302)
at cad.core.kernel.Supervisor.executeJavaCommand(Supervisor.java:2793)
at cad.core.kernel.Supervisor.executeCommand(Supervisor.java:1971)
at cad.core.kernel.Supervisor.executeMethod(Supervisor.java:2090)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.python.core.PyReflectedFunction.__call__(PyReflectedFunction.java:188)
at org.python.core.PyReflectedFunction.__call__(PyReflectedFunction.java:206)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:545)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:551)
at org.python.core.PyMethod.__call__(PyMethod.java:171)
at pydb$py.executeMethod$200(pydb.py:1569)
at pydb$py.call_function(pydb.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:171)
at org.python.core.PyBaseCode.call(PyBaseCode.java:171)
at org.python.core.PyFunction.__call__(PyFunction.java:434)
at org.python.core.PyMethod.__call__(PyMethod.java:156)
at pydb$py.__call__$167(pydb.py:1342)
at pydb$py.call_function(pydb.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:171)
at org.python.core.PyBaseCode.call(PyBaseCode.java:308)
at org.python.core.PyBaseCode.call(PyBaseCode.java:199)
at org.python.core.PyFunction.__call__(PyFunction.java:482)
at org.python.core.PyMethod.instancemethod___call__(PyMethod.java:237)
at org.python.core.PyMethod.__call__(PyMethod.java:228)
at org.python.core.PyMethod.__call__(PyMethod.java:223)
at org.python.core.PyObject.invoke(PyObject.java:3715)
at org.python.core.PyInstance.instance___call__(PyInstance.java:377)
at org.python.core.PyInstance.__call__(PyInstance.java:372)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:424)
at org.python.pycode._pyx845.f$0(<input>:1)
at org.python.pycode._pyx845.call_function(<input>)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:171)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
at org.python.core.Py.runCode(Py.java:1625)
at org.python.core.Py.exec(Py.java:1669)
at org.python.util.PythonInterpreter.exec(PythonInterpreter.java:276)
at cad.core.kernel.components.PythonWrapper.runCode(PythonWrapper.java:628)
at cad.core.kernel.components.PythonWrapper.runsource(PythonWrapper.java:623)
at cad.core.kernel.components.PythonWrapper.runsource(PythonWrapper.java:598)
at cad.core.kernel.components.PythonWrapper.runsource(PythonWrapper.java:593)
at cad.core.kernel.components.PythonWrapper.execute(PythonWrapper.java:638)
at cad.core.kernel.components.PythonWrapper.executeFunction(PythonWrapper.java:706)
at cad.core.kernel.encoder.CommandServerRequestsInputPlug.executeCommand(CommandServerRequestsInputPlug.java:79)
at stdcom.protocole.commandserverrequests.CommandServerRequestsRouter.executeCommand(CommandServerRequestsRouter.java:70)
at stdcom.protocole.commandserverrequests.CommandServerRequestsOutputPlug.executeCommand(CommandServerRequestsOutputPlug.java:111)
at cad.core.frontal.decoder.FrontalDecoder.executeCommand(FrontalDecoder.java:690)
at cad.core.frontal.actions.implementation.GeneralAction.executeBox(GeneralAction.java:286)
at cad.flux.frontal.actions.implementation.algo.project.FAbstractSaveAsAction.executeBox(FAbstractSaveAsAction.java:93)
at cad.core.frontal.actions.implementation.GeneralAction.postAct(GeneralAction.java:254)
at cad.core.frontal.actions.implementation.GeneralAction.interpret(GeneralAction.java:315)
at cad.core.frontal.components.box.frontaldialog.FrontalDescriptorDialogBox.internalRun(FrontalDescriptorDialogBox.java:296)
at cad.core.frontal.frontalthread.WorkerThread.executeImplementer(WorkerThread.java:226)
at cad.core.frontal.frontalthread.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:274)
Altair EmployeeThank you so much!
The 2 circular figures (left and center) were only to check the differences between the standard and the mapped mesh.
Any experience in this respect?
Hi,
As you can see in the PPT file, it is not possible to use a face mapped mesh on your configuration. but there is another way to do it, you create a line decritisation (for example arithmetic and assign this decritisation to the lines of the faces (6 and 7).
Best regards.
Hi,
The problem come from the mesh of the face 6 and 7 (see atached PPt file). When I change the mesh of these faces, I reached to solve the porject without any error message. Other thing, I made some modification on the circuit, I add a resistance in // with current source (in Flux, when you use three current source you need to add a resistance with high value in //), also I change the connection of the ground.
You will find attached the new project ready to solve.
Best regards.
Unable to find an attachment - read this blog