Issue with Shell Elements Intersecting 3D Elements in HyperWorks Simulations

Ali_22006
Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
edited February 14 in Community Q&A

Hi Team,

I've been exploring various features in HyperWorks, but I've hit a snag. I've encountered a situation where shell elements are intersecting or penetrating 3D elements. An example of this can be seen in the rubber ring tutorial available at the HyperWorks Solver documentation (refer to: Rubber Ring Tutorial in HyperWorks Solver Help).

Could this be a rendering issue within HyperWorks, and is there a way to manage this effectively? Any guidance on how to prevent this from happening would be greatly appreciated.

Answers

  • Paulo  Libório
    Paulo Libório New Altair Community Member
    edited February 8

    Hey Ali,

    Seems alright here:

    image

    Have you changed anything in the tutorial model? Or is is like that straight from opening?

    Please try downloading it from here: https://help.altair.com/hwsolvers/os/topics/solvers/os/rubber_ring_crush_slide_self_contact_os_tut_r.htm#reference_fdy_c1c_hjb

    Kind Regards,
    Paulo Libório.

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 9

    Hello Paulo,

    I appreciate your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I'm also facing the same issue with a model that I cannot discuss in public forums. The same problem persists, and I'm at a loss for what could be causing it. Could you please offer some guidance or suggestions on what might be the root of this issue?

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 9

    Here is a snapshot of it: 

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 9

    It is when I am plotting the results in hyperview, during the animation it happens. 

  • Paulo  Libório
    Paulo Libório New Altair Community Member
    edited February 9
    Ali_22006 said:

    It is when I am plotting the results in hyperview, during the animation it happens. 

    Hey Ali,

    If components are penetrating during results visualization, it means lack of or improper setup of contacts between them.

    Use these videos as reference:

    Kind Regards,
    Paulo Libório.

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 12

    Hey Ali,

    If components are penetrating during results visualization, it means lack of or improper setup of contacts between them.

    Use these videos as reference:

    Kind Regards,
    Paulo Libório.

    Hi Paulo,
    In your opinion the connection setup in this tutorial: https://2023.help.altair.com/2023/hwsolvers/os/topics/solvers/os/rubber_ring_hwx_tutorial_r.htm#reference_mtw_vt2_nwb, Isn't correct? Because I used this tutorial and found the same intersection? 

  • Paulo  Libório
    Paulo Libório New Altair Community Member
    edited February 12
    Ali_22006 said:

    Hi Paulo,
    In your opinion the connection setup in this tutorial: https://2023.help.altair.com/2023/hwsolvers/os/topics/solvers/os/rubber_ring_hwx_tutorial_r.htm#reference_mtw_vt2_nwb, Isn't correct? Because I used this tutorial and found the same intersection? 

    Ali,

    I wouldn't say "not correct". Although, there's one setting in the PCONT property that might help with contact penetration. GPAD → THICK

    image

    And then, you can check Contact Deformation SPOS / Normal (Penetration) output to check actual values for penetration.

    image

    Visually, there's no penetration. But I can see from the contour that there's some. Is it acceptable? Should you refine your mesh in the contact region? It all depends on your model.

    But if you have set this up exactly like the tutorial and you're seeing that much of visual penetration, then there might be something odd going on. Can you open the model I attach and check this?

    Kind Regards,
    Paulo Libório.

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 12

    Ali,

    I wouldn't say "not correct". Although, there's one setting in the PCONT property that might help with contact penetration. GPAD → THICK

    image

    And then, you can check Contact Deformation SPOS / Normal (Penetration) output to check actual values for penetration.

    image

    Visually, there's no penetration. But I can see from the contour that there's some. Is it acceptable? Should you refine your mesh in the contact region? It all depends on your model.

    But if you have set this up exactly like the tutorial and you're seeing that much of visual penetration, then there might be something odd going on. Can you open the model I attach and check this?

    Kind Regards,
    Paulo Libório.

    Thanks but I can't find the attached model, Can you please resend

  • Paulo  Libório
    Paulo Libório New Altair Community Member
    edited February 12

    Done model

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 13

    I don't think this is the correct approach, 

    My understanding of GPAD was to take account of shell thickness if the thickness occupies space in the gap. Since I configured the surfaces elements to represent the outer shell and the thickness was directed away from the gap, I didn't think it would cause such an issue.image

  • Ali_22006
    Ali_22006 Altair Community Member
    edited February 14

    Hi Paulo, 
    We try turning on GPAD and it still doesn't solve the issue, Is there any other place where I can look?image

  • Jason_Craanen
    Jason_Craanen
    Altair Employee
    edited February 14
    Ali_22006 said:

    Hi Paulo,
    In your opinion the connection setup in this tutorial: https://2023.help.altair.com/2023/hwsolvers/os/topics/solvers/os/rubber_ring_hwx_tutorial_r.htm#reference_mtw_vt2_nwb, Isn't correct? Because I used this tutorial and found the same intersection? 

    Can you please share the fem and h3d from your setup for this tutorial?

  • Jason_Craanen
    Jason_Craanen
    Altair Employee
    edited February 14

    Hello,

    For your particular question referring to the Ring tutorial, yes GPAD=THICK will solve your issue. 

     

    image