Frequency load in HyperMesh using Nastran solver
Answers
-
I assume you're trying to build a FRF analysis (Sol 111 or 112).
You might reference to OptiStruct tutorial for FRF, as it is pretty similar to Nastran Setup.
Besides these steps from the tutorials, you will need to add 'SOL 111 or 112' card and make sure results are requested in Punch or OP2 formats, instead of H3D.
As you already use HM, it would be easier to run this in OptiStruct, by the way.
Advanced Small Displacement Finite Element Analysis
- OS-T: 1300 Direct Frequency Response Analysis of a Flat Plate
This tutorial demonstrates how to import an existing FE model, apply boundary conditions, and perform a finite element analysis on a flat plate. - OS-T: 1305 Modal Frequency Response Analysis of a Flat Plate
This tutorial demonstrates how to import an existing FE model, apply boundary conditions, and perform a modal frequency response analysis on a flat plate.
0 - OS-T: 1300 Direct Frequency Response Analysis of a Flat Plate
-
Hi Adriano,
Thank you very much.
I received this query from a user and I gave him this post link for further updates.
0 -
thank you, sir
small displacement finite element analysis section was very helpful, this section only gives displacement values for varying loads with respect to time.
but i require stress and strains also to that corresponding displacements generated.
i tried many control cards to print stress and strain, but there was no use.
Irrespective of so many cards selected, the output file (f06 file) only contained displacement for varying load with respect to time.
please help me in this matter.
0 -
i believe adding PARAM,POST,-1 or -2 might help you.
Ohterwise, add manually the Cards (something like this)
STRESS(PRINT) = ALL
STRAIN(PRINT) = ALL
depending if you want Magnitude or Phase, or Real Imaginary, you will need to adjust.
Usually people also request this in Punch/PLOT Format, to plot in HyperGraph.
I'm not super familiar to Nastran outputs, but you migh look here and then find these card in HyperMesh.
https://femci.gsfc.nasa.gov/sine_vib/
Take care with FRF results size as depending on your model size it might get huge.
So usually people request results only for desired elements/nodes, creating a SET for output and selecting it.
0 -
please go through files attached
the output of dynamic analysis is 1000 times greater than that of static analysis
I have verified for input units in both the case the E, G, Nu is the same , but yet there is drastic change in dynamic output.
0 -
hi,
by your description your dynamic load (transient) is using this table shown above, with a ramp from 0 to 1000.
This means that you're multiplying your forces (total 1000N) times the TABLED1 value, thus resulting in a load 1000x higher than your statics.
Your table could be changed to have a maximum value of 1.0 multiplied by your forces (~1000N)
0 -
thank u sir,
0