FEKO simulation

Altair Forum User
Altair Forum User
Altair Employee
edited October 2020 in Community Q&A

Dear all, I have a problem with antenna design in FEKO why all the examples was ignored the thickness of copper?

 

Tagged:

Answers

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited December 2017

    Hi @mkh

     

    Good question.

    There are different ways to model metals in FEKO.

    Firstly, when you create a new part, the default material properties are set to PEC. For most antenna applications this is an accurate approximation. However, you can certainly model different non-perfect metal types in FEKO. And when you set a face property to e.g. copper, you will be required to enter the thickness of the metal .

     

    I hope this helps.

     

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited January 2018

    Thank you, Sir. for help. but I am I wondering why the response of reflection coefficient is different if we change the type of feeding in FEKO. For example in the examples guide of FEKO the example [A8] change the feeding type for the same variable design of microstrip antenna we noticed that the far-field radiation is approximately similar but the reflection coefficient is different as shown in attached photo.

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>db.PNG

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited January 2018

    It is likely that changing the ground plane to infinite (red curve) can change the reflection coefficient.

    The difference between the blue and green curves is approximately a 1% frequency shift, which is very small. Have you done a mesh convergence study for each of the methods? I would suggest to do this first, but it is also possible that the small frequency shift is related to the differences in the  numerics for the 2 methods. 

     

     

  • Altair Forum User
    Altair Forum User
    Altair Employee
    edited January 2018

    I will do the mesh convergence study, but I wonder which method for solving will be the closest one to the measurement values.