The Siemens Community Catalyst program was co-created with our community to acknowledge technology leaders who consistently contribute to the Siemens Community. Nominations are accepted on a rolling basis.
I have a model with 5 parts and it is symmetric. I partitioned as much as I can, but still, have an issue in mappable solid as the picture below (this is the simples and most complex part in the model)
Any advice on partitioning?
Thanks!
sphere shape profile always good to partition with two sections for better mapping results...secondly check geometrical error
merge once the existing partitions and try splinting with intersecting lines as reference
I have a model with 5 parts and it is symmetric. I partitioned as much as I can, but still, have an issue in mappable solid as the picture below (this is the simples and most complex part in the model) Any advice on partitioning? Thanks! <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
Share your HM model?
Hey Dear,
Please visit following link to mesh spherical parts
sphere shape profile always good to partition with two sections for better mapping results...secondly check geometrical error merge once the existing partitions and try splinting with intersecting lines as reference
Thank you for your advice! I saw the other user in this line sharing a way of partitioning the sphere. Are you suggesting the same way?
What does it mean by merging the existing partitions?
Hi lanwujiu
Do not split each and every section and make it complex. you can split the sphere into two section upper and lower. Suppress few lines like mentioned below and refer it as along lines.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
Thank you
Hi lanwujiu Do not split each and every section and make it complex. you can split the sphere into two section upper and lower. Suppress few lines like mentioned below and refer it as along lines. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> Thank you
Thanks, I merged those parts and tried again, the vertical line is from the geometry so I could not remove it. The lower part is not a part of a sphere but a flat bottom, maybe it is the case why it is still mappable. I am trying to mesh it in a quarter model.
Hi, thank you. The problem is solved.
Join us for a community conversation on how High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Simcenter PSIM work together to meet the increasing demands of modern power electronics simulation. During this one-hour technical session, you'll discover how leveraging HPC can speed up simulations, improve scalability, and empower engineers…
Join us for a community conversation on accelerating your motor simulation workflow with Simcenter Simlab. In this beginner-friendly session, we'll introduce the platform's automated model-building capabilities and show how easy it is to set up your first electric motor analysis. You'll see the basic steps of geometry…
Join us for a Community Conversation where we'll discuss practical approaches to analyzing complex electromagnetic models using hybrid solver techniques. This session will provide a general overview of how different computational methods can be combined within a single simulation to address models containing varied…