🎉Community Raffle - Win $25

An exclusive raffle opportunity for active members like you! Complete your profile, answer questions and get your first accepted badge to enter the raffle.
Join and Win

springback procedure & results

User: "Altair Forum User"
Altair Employee
Updated by Altair Forum User

Hello All,

Thanks for clearing all my previous queries,

Here after many trials of springback simulation using all possible ways of the springback setup (i.e. Using automatic/manual/ auto process/advance tools/multistage). I have found the unacceptable  spring back results that , in case of a hat section.

Here as shown in fig 2. the hat section part after forming-springback the part is going inside (-ve springback, which is unacceptable), i.e. if we bending/forming/flanging a part with 90° it will be springback with the bend angle as 90°+1or2 degree, but springback bend angle will be always greater than the bend angle.

But in this case the springback is showing as shown in FIG 2.

Image contains 1. springback part, 2. Actual Part, 3. As per the actual forming procedure

Please help me what should I do to evaluate the springback, You can take any Hat section part & form it using Pad ( since it is my Design requirement shown as in fig 1)

 

Please reply,

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>spring back_question.png

Find more posts tagged with

Sort by:
1 - 5 of 51
    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    OP
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    Hi Sumit,

     

    Can you share the *.hf file or the *.rad file which you have used for running springback ?

     

    i can help you further.

    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    OP
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    Hello Santosh,

    Here Please Find the Attachments,

    1) Forming Rar contains forming setup

    2) Springback Contains Springback Setup

    3) also sent separately the .rad , .hf & h3d File for results

     

    Suggest any other method or help me to correct it.

    Unable to find an attachment - read this blog

    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    OP
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    Hi sumit,

     

    You need to use Adaptivity at the areas which is forming.

     

    Please find the attached files solved. let me know if you find difficulty.

     

    regards

    santhosh

    Unable to find an attachment - read this blog

    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    OP
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    Dear Santhosh,

    I am really thanking you for replying my problem but my actual question is when  doing springback (as in your case also), after comparing the springback part with the 00.rad (only forming) part the formed part with springback is inside the part which is not acceptable as shown in fig 1& 2below.

    The comparison image is in fig no. 3, 4 , Please refer below. (checkout the image 4 the springback part is springing inside (only) formed part.

     

    Thanks & Regards,

    Sumit P.

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>1.png

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>spbk3.png

    User: "Altair Forum User"
    Altair Employee
    OP
    Updated by Altair Forum User

    Hi Sumit,

     

    When i measure the *.H3D file. I see below changes, which is fair.

      

    Please recheck with measuring the displacement manually once.

     

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>after springback.GIF

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>befor springback.GIF