RBE3 - Slave node with Boundary Condition

IRA_EM_21281
IRA_EM_21281 Altair Community Member
edited October 2020 in Community Q&A

Hi Folks,

 

I am curious how the solver finds a solution when the dependent node (slave) has a boundary condition Uy=0 at the SPC shown in blue. See attached.

 

In the case of a rbe2 element, it is clear that the independent node (master) would have the BC Uy=0 and thus the dependent node set can be solved for.

 

Any comments?

 

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>RBE3_ReactionForce.PNG

Answers

  • Adriano_Koga
    Adriano_Koga
    Altair Employee
    edited July 2020

    that's exactly why you cannot apply a BC in RBE3. You will be generating kinematic conditions conflict, thus an error.

     

    For constraining a RBE3 dependent, you could use as a workaround, create a CBUSH attached to the RBE3, with RIGID stiffness, and ground the CBUSH node.

  • IRA_EM_21281
    IRA_EM_21281 Altair Community Member
    edited July 2020

    That's what I thought but the model solved successfully and so I looked into it further. It seems Optistruct uses PARAM, AUTOMSET to switch the dependent to an independent 

    image.png.c24622b55bb268f9320510ea59a441f2.png

     

    Now I am wondering does the element still behave as an rbe3?

     

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.